Comparative effectiveness of stereotactic, subdural, or hybrid intracranial EEG monitoring in epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical intervention can be curative or palliative for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. However, if the seizure onset zone (SOZ) cannot be adequately localized via noninvasive tests, intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings are often carried out to develop surgical plans in appropriate candidates. Stereotactic EEG (SEEG), subdural EEG (SDE), and SDE with depth electrodes (hybrid) are major tools used for investigation, but there is no class 1 or 2 evidence comparing the effectiveness of these modalities. METHODS: The authors identified an institutional cohort of patients who underwent iEEG monitoring between 2001 and 2022. Demographic data, preoperative clinical features, iEEG intervention, and follow-up data were identified. Primary study endpoints included the following: 1) likelihood of SOZ localization; 2) likelihood of surgical treatment after iEEG; 3) seizure outcomes; and 4) complications. RESULTS: A total of 329 patients were identified (176 in the SEEG, 60 in the SDE, and 93 in the hybrid cohort) who were followed for a median of 5.4 (IQR 6.8) years. Baseline characteristics, including demographics, mean age at epilepsy diagnosis, mean age at iEEG investigation, number of preoperative antiseizure medications, and preoperative seizure frequency, were not statistically different across the 3 cohorts. Patients in the SEEG cohort were more likely to have their SOZ localized than were the patients in the SDE group (OR 2.3) and were less likely to undergo subsequent resection (OR 0.3) or to have complications (OR 0.4), although there was no statistical difference with respect to likelihood of undergoing any subsequent neurosurgical treatment, or with respect to favorable seizure outcomes. Patients in the hybrid cohort were more likely to have SOZ localized than were patients in the SDE group (OR 3.1), but were more likely to undergo resection (OR 4.9) or any neurosurgical treatment (OR 2.5) compared to patients in the SEEG group. Patients in the hybrid cohort had better seizure outcomes compared to the SDE (OR 2.3) but not to the SEEG group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the SEEG group were more likely to have their SOZ localized and patients in the SDE group were more likely to undergo resection, but they did not differ with respect to seizure outcomes.

Evaluating the Utility of Repeat Computed Tomography Scans in Patients with Isolated Mild Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) is a common consequence of head trauma. Treatment of patients with tSAH commonly involves serial computed tomography (CT) scans to assess for expansile hemorrhage. However, growing evidence suggests that these patients rarely deteriorate or require neurosurgical intervention. We assessed the utility of repeat CT scans in adult patients with isolated tSAH and an intact initial neurological examination. METHODS: Patients presenting to Mass General Brigham hospitals with tSAH between 2000 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were excluded if subarachnoid hemorrhage was nontraumatic, they experienced another form of intracerebral hemorrhage, or they had a documented Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤12 and/or poor presenting neurological examination. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 405 patients were included (191 male). The most common mechanism of trauma was fall from standing (58%). The mean number of total CT scans for all patients was 2.3, with 329 patients (80%) receiving ≥2 scans. In 309 patients, no significant neurological symptoms were present. No patients developed acute neurological deterioration or required neurosurgical intervention related to their bleed, although 5 patients had mild hemorrhagic expansion on follow-up imaging. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, repeat imaging rarely demonstrated meaningful hemorrhagic expansion in this cohort of neurologically intact patients with isolated tSAH. In these patients with mild traumatic brain injury, excessive CT scans are perhaps unlikely to affect patient management and may present unnecessary burden to patients and hospital systems.

Brief report on the efficacy of sotorasib in KRAS-Mutated NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Sotorasib has emerged as a treatment option for patients with KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, its effect in patients with brain metastases is not well described. We assessed the intracranial response of sotorasib in a retrospective case series of patients with brain metastases (BMs) at a single institution. METHODS: Patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC with BMs who received sotorasib at Mass General Brigham Hospitals were included. Patients were stratified into three groups: patients with active BM without local therapy within one month of sotorasib initiation (group 1), patients with active BM with local therapy (surgery or radiation) within one month of sotorasib initiation (group 2), and patients with stable BM (group 3). Intracranial progression-free survival (ICPFS) and overall survival (OS) were explored using Kaplan Meier curves that were compared through log-rank test. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included (five in group 1; seven in group 2; 18 in group 3). Mean age at sotorasib initiation was 60 years. Most (67 %) patients had between one and four BMs at sotorasib initiation. Median ICPFS was three months (95 % CI: 0- 7.7) from start of sotorasib for group 1, two months (0-5.7) for group 2, and 15 months (6.0-24.0) for group 3 (p-value = 0.02). Median OS was four months (1.9-6.1) for group 1, six months (0-13.7) for group 2, and 12 months (3.5-20.5) for group 3 (p-value = 0.13). 57 % of patients experienced intracranial progression, including 44 % of patients who had stable BM at sotorasib initiation. CONCLUSION: While sotorasib may have some intracranial activity, a multidisciplinary approach to BM therapy is still warranted, as are future studies with larger patient samples, controls, and extended follow-up.

Intraoperative Performance with the Exoscope in Spine Surgery: An Institutional Experience.

BACKGROUND: Exoscope use in spinal neurosurgery has become a promising surgical option providing enhanced operative field visibility and ergonomics. However, data on its use in spine surgery are underreported in the literature. We aimed to assess the intraoperative outcomes in exoscope-assisted spine surgery compared with similar procedures performed using the operative microscope. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all spinal surgeries performed using an exoscope and, subsequently, an equal number of operative microscope cases performed by 2 senior surgeons at a single institution from 2016 to 2023. The variables included demographics, clinical presentation, surgical treatment, and operative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 123 exoscope spinal surgeries were performed on 116 unique patients with a mean age of 67 ± 14 years, of whom 60 (52%) were women. The microscope group included 126 surgeries on 120 unique patients with a mean age of 62 ± 14 years, of whom 53 (45%) were women. The mean blood loss (28 mL vs. 132 mL; P = 0.0009), operative time (83 minutes vs. 103 minutes; P = 0.006), and length of stay (1.04 days vs. 1.73 days; P = 0.02) were significantly less for the exoscope group than for the microscope group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the exoscope resulted in a shorter operative time, less blood loss, a shorter length of stay, and favorable clinical outcomes compared with the use of the operative microscope. Neurosurgeons should consider this seemingly efficacious and ergonomically favorable visual technology for spinal surgeries.

External ventricular drains and risk of freehand placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: External ventricular drains (EVDs) are used to monitor and treat elevated intracranial pressure. EVDs are often placed blindly without the use of imaging guidance, and successful placement with respect to pass attempts and final catheter location may suffer as a result of this freehand technique. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify studies pertaining to freehand EVD placement through March 30, 2022. Studies were included if they reported percentage of EVDs placed successfully on the first pass attempt, or final catheter location as defined by the Kakarla Grading System. Pooled weighted incidence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS: Of the 2964 results returned from the literature search, 39 studies were included in this meta-analysis. These studies reported on 6313 EVDs placed via freehand technique in 6070 patients with the following respective incidence: successful EVD placement on the first attempt (78%, 95%CI: 67-86%); placement with a Kakarla Grade of 1 (optimal location) (72%, 95%CI: 66-77%); hemorrhage (7%, 95%CI: 6-10%), and infection (5%, 95%CI: 3-8%). CONCLUSIONS: Only 78% of EVDs in this meta-analysis were placed successfully on the first pass, and only 72% of final placements were deemed optimal. This represents a relatively high rate of suboptimal outcomes with respect to EVD placement, which could potentially be avoided with the use of navigation-assisted placement techniques.

An expanded role for surgery in grade 3 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma.

Background: Grade 3 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma is an uncommon primary CNS tumor with a high rate of progression and recurrence. This study examines the benefit of surgery after progression and identifies predictors of survival. Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with anaplastic or grade 3 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma diagnosed between 2001 and 2020. Results: Eighty patients with 1p/19q co-deleted grade 3 oligodendroglioma were included. The median age was 47 years (interquartile range 38-56) and 38.8% were women. All patients underwent surgery, including gross total resection (GTR) for 26.3% of patients, subtotal resection (STR) for 70.0% of patients, and biopsy for 3.8% of patients. Forty-three cases (53.8%) progressed at a median of 5.6 years, and the median overall survival (OS) was 14.1 years. Among 43 cases of progression or recurrence, 21 (48.8%) underwent another resection. Patients who underwent a second operation had improved OS (P = .041) and survival after progression/recurrence (P = .012), but similar time to subsequent progression as patients who did not have repeat surgery (P = .50). Predictors of mortality at initial diagnosis included a preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) under 80 (hazard ratio [HR] 5.4; 95% CI 1.5-19.2), an STR or biopsy rather than GTR (HR 4.1; 95% CI 1.2-14.2), and a persistent postoperative neurologic deficit (HR 4.0; 95% CI 1.2-14.1). Conclusions: Repeat surgery is associated with increased survival, but not time to subsequent progression for progressing or recurrent 1p/19q co-deleted grade 3 oligodendrogliomas recur. Mortality is associated with a preoperative KPS under 80, lack of GTR, and persistent postoperative neurologic deficits after the initial surgery.

The Current State of Neurosurgery in Afghanistan.

BACKGROUND: Afghanistan has suffered through conflicts that have detrimentally impacted its health care systems. The countries' neurosurgeons have worked through wars and political upheavals to build solid practices and handle large caseloads with minimal supplies and almost no modern tools. Understanding the current state of neurosurgery in Afghanistan and the challenges faced by Afghan physicians and patients is critical to improving the country's healthcare capacity. METHODS: To assess neurosurgery research in Afghanistan, searches were conducted in databases for articles originating from Afghanistan neurosurgeons and/or neurosurgery departments. We developed a 30-question English-language survey to assess the current state of neurosurgical capacity. Surveys were distributed to neurosurgeons throughout Afghanistan via email with the assistance of our English-speaking Afghan neurosurgical colleagues. RESULTS: The neurosurgical disease burden of Afghanistan is poorly understood due to the lack of centralized and accessible databases. There are an estimated 124 neurosurgeons in the country based on modeled data. Surveys showed that government hospitals are poorly equipped, with private and military hospitals having access to slightly more modernized equipment but less accessible to the general population. The country lacks neurosurgery research with only 15 papers discovered through database searches deemed relevant to neurosurgery with Afghan affiliations. CONCLUSIONS: Afghanistan is facing existential humanitarian threats. Developing the country's neurosurgical capacity and general health care capabilities is crucial. Emphasis on training physicians and establishing communication routes, and aid deliverance with the country and its leaders is key to overcoming the many crises it faces.

Effect of awake craniotomy in glioblastoma in eloquent areas (GLIOMAP): a propensity score-matched analysis of an international, multicentre, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Awake mapping has been associated with decreased neurological deficits and increased extent of resection in eloquent glioma resections. However, its effect within clinically relevant glioblastoma subgroups remains poorly understood. We aimed to assess the benefit of this technique in subgroups of patients with glioblastomas based on age, preoperative neurological morbidity, and Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS). METHODS: In this propensity score-matched analysis of an international, multicentre, cohort study (GLIOMAP), patients were recruited at four tertiary centres in Europe (Erasmus MC, Rotterdam and Haaglanden MC, The Hague, Netherlands, and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium) and the USA (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA). Patients were eligible if they were aged 18-90 years, undergoing resection, had a histopathological diagnosis of primary glioblastoma, their tumour was in an eloquent or near-eloquent location, and they had a unifocal enhancing lesion. Patients either underwent awake mapping during craniotomy, or asleep resection, as per treating physician or multidisciplinary tumour board decision. We used propensity-score matching (1:3) to match patients in the awake group with those in the asleep group to create a matched cohort, and to match patients from subgroups stratified by age (<70 years vs ≥70 years), preoperative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (score of 0-1 vs ≥2), and preoperative KPS (90-100 vs ≤80). We used Cox proportional hazard regressions to analyse the effect of awake mapping on the primary outcomes including postoperative neurological deficits (measured by deterioration in NIHSS score at 6 week, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively), overall survival, and progression-free survival. We used logistic regression to analyse the predictive value of awake mapping and other perioperative factors on postoperative outcomes. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2010, and Oct 31, 2020, 3919 patients were recruited, of whom 1047 with tumour resection for primary eloquent glioblastoma were included in analyses as the overall unmatched cohort. After propensity-score matching, the overall matched cohort comprised 536 patients, of whom 134 had awake craniotomies and 402 had asleep resection. In the overall matched cohort, awake craniotomy versus asleep resection resulted in fewer neurological deficits at 3 months (26 [22%] of 120 vs 107 [33%] of 323; p=0·019) and 6 months (30 [26%] of 115 vs 125 [41%] of 305; p=0·0048) postoperatively, longer overall survival (median 17·0 months [95% CI 15·0-24·0] vs 14·0 months [13·0-16·0]; p=0·00054), and longer progression-free survival (median 9·0 months [8·0-11·0] vs 7·3 months [6·0-8·8]; p=0·0060). In subgroup analyses, fewer postoperative neurological deficits occurred at 3 months and at 6 months with awake craniotomy versus asleep resection in patients younger than 70 years (3 months: 22 [21%] of 103 vs 93 [34%] of 272; p=0·016; 6 months: 24 [24%] of 101 vs 108 [42%] of 258; p=0·0014), those with an NIHSS score of 0-1 (3 months: 22 [23%] of 96 vs 97 [38%] of 254; p=0·0071; 6 months: 27 [28%] of 95 vs 115 [48%] of 239; p=0·0010), and those with a KPS of 90-100 (3 months: 17 [19%] of 88 vs 74 [35%] of 237; p=0·034; 6 months: 24 [28%] of 87 vs 101 [45%] of 223, p=0·0043). Additionally, fewer postoperative neurological deficits were seen in the awake group versus the asleep group at 3 months in patients aged 70 years and older (two [13%] of 16 vs 15 [43%] of 35; p=0·033; no difference seen at 6 months), with a NIHSS score of 2 or higher (3 months: three [13%] of 23 vs 21 [36%] of 58; p=0·040) and at 6 months in those with a KPS of 80 or lower (five [18%] of 28 vs 34 [39%] of 88; p=0·043; no difference seen at 3 months). Median overall survival was longer for the awake group than the asleep group in the subgroups younger than 70 years (19·5 months [95% CI 16·0-31·0] vs 15·0 months [13·0-17·0]; p<0·0001), an NIHSS score of 0-1 (18·0 months [16·0-31·0] vs 14·0 months [13·0-16·5]; p=0·00047), and KPS of 90-100 (19·0 months [16·0-31·0] vs 14·5 months [13·0-16·5]; p=0·00058). Median progression-free survival was also longer in the awake group than in the asleep group in patients younger than 70 years (9·3 months [95% CI 8·0-12·0] vs 7·5 months [6·5-9·0]; p=0·0061), in those with an NIHSS score of 0-1 (9·5 months [9·0-12·0] vs 8·0 months [6·5-9·0]; p=0·0035), and in those with a KPS of 90-100 (10·0 months [9·0-13·0] vs 8·0 months [7·0-9·0]; p=0·0010). No difference was seen in overall survival or progression-free survival between the awake group and the asleep group for those aged 70 years and older, with NIHSS scores of 2 or higher, or with a KPS of 80 or lower. INTERPRETATION: These data might aid neurosurgeons with the assessment of their surgical strategy in individual glioblastoma patients. These findings will be validated and further explored in the SAFE trial (NCT03861299) and the PROGRAM study (NCT04708171). FUNDING: None.

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on stroke response times: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 presents a risk for delays to stroke treatment. We examined how COVID-19 affected stroke response times. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify articles covering stroke during COVID-19 that included time metrics data pre- and post-pandemic. For each outcome, pooled relative change from baseline and 95% CI were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was explored through subgroup analyses comparing comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) to non-CSCs. RESULTS: 38 included studies reported on 6109 patients during COVID-19 and 14 637 patients during the pre-COVID period. Pooled increases of 20.9% (95% CI 5.8% to 36.1%) in last-known-well (LKW) to arrival times, 1.2% (-2.9% to 5.3%) in door-to-imaging (DTI), 0.8% (-2.9% to 4.5%) in door-to-needle (DTN), 2.8% (-5.0% to 10.6%) in door-to-groin (DTG), and 19.7% (11.1% to 28.2%) in door-to-reperfusion (DTR) times were observed during COVID-19. At CSCs, LKW increased by 24.0% (-0.3% to 48.2%), DTI increased by 1.6% (-3.0% to 6.1%), DTN increased by 3.6% (1.2% to 6.0%), DTG increased by 4.6% (-5.9% to 15.1%), and DTR increased by 21.2% (12.3% to 30.1%). At non-CSCs, LKW increased by 12.4% (-1.0% to 25.7%), DTI increased by 0.2% (-2.0% to 2.4%), DTN decreased by -4.6% (-11.9% to 2.7%), DTG decreased by -0.6% (-8.3% to 7.1%), and DTR increased by 0.5% (-31.0% to 32.0%). The increases during COVID-19 in LKW (p=0.01) and DTR (p=0.00) were statistically significant, as was the difference in DTN delays between CSCs and non-CSCs (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Factors during COVID-19 resulted in significantly delayed LKW and DTR, and mild delays in DTI, DTN, and DTG. CSCs experience more pronounced delays than non-CSCs.

Oral Contraceptive and Menopausal Hormone Therapy Use and Risk of Pituitary Adenoma: Cohort and Case-Control Analyses.

CONTEXT: No prospective epidemiologic studies have examined associations between use of oral contraceptives (OCs) or menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and risk of pituitary adenoma in women. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the association between use of OC and MHT and risk of pituitary adenoma in two separate datasets. METHODS: We evaluated the association of OC/MHT with risk of pituitary adenoma in the Nurses' Health Study and Nurses' Health Study II by computing multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (MVHR) of pituitary adenoma by OC/MHT use using Cox proportional hazards models. Simultaneously, we carried out a matched case-control study using an institutional data repository to compute multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (MVOR) of pituitary adenoma by OC/MHT use. RESULTS: In the cohort analysis, during 6 668 019 person-years, 331 participants reported a diagnosis of pituitary adenoma. Compared to never-users, neither past (MVHR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.80-1.36) nor current OC use (MVHR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.40-1.32) was associated with risk. For MHT, compared to never-users, both past (MVHR = 2.00; 95% CI, 1.50-2.68) and current use (MVHR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.27-2.55) were associated with pituitary adenoma risk, as was longer duration (MVHR = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.42-2.99 comparing more than 5 years of use to never, P trend = .002). Results were similar in lagged analyses, when stratified by body mass index, and among those with recent health care use. In the case-control analysis, we included 5469 cases. Risk of pituitary adenoma was increased with ever use of MHT (MVOR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.35-1.83) and OC (MVOR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.42) compared to never. CONCLUSION: Compared to never use, current and past MHT use and longer duration of MHT use were positively associated with higher risk of pituitary adenoma in 2 independent data sets. OC use was not associated with risk in the prospective cohort analysis and was associated with only mildly increased risk in the case-control analysis.